Welcome toShandong translation network
About us | Add to Favorites | Contact us | 中文版
Roger this newest opinion on public affairs: A lot of words are considered to st
From;    Author:Stand originally

On July 9, 2008, hainan, on the metaphase strategy seminar that in the country golden negotiable securities holds, jim · Roger this in face media to be opposite its A when the doubt of yield, state oneself never had bought A first. This character, chinese shareholder an in an uproar: Sing all the way to Chinese stock market much, your countless China the legend that confuses pay homage to invests a Great Master, had not bought A at all actually? Is this to opening international fun? Roger this ” of “ vermicelli made from bean starch is to not have more language: Were we fooled?

For this, " red weekly " was opposite with respect to a few sensitive issues recently Jim · Roger this had exclusive special report.



“A expensive, why am I bought even? ”

" red weekly " : Did you buy A after all not?

Roger this: I never had bought A, never also have had said I had bought A. I had explained a lot of times, what I buy all the time is B, H, S, and the ADR that buys Chinese company to issue in the United States, because they compare A all the time,this is cheap! Why I buy more expensive A even? Goofy ability will be so only dry!

" red weekly " : You value Chinese stock market all the time, why to buy A? Be because,merely A than H, B expensive? Whether do you invest Chinese A through QFII?

Roger this: you do not know, besides A beyond, is there still many H on this world, B, S, Europe, US stock? Yes, I do not buy A, because of A expensive. The word says again, when a person can buy cheap share, why he is bought even again expensive? Successful investor always chooses petty gain, and not be expensive absolutely, this is the basiccest rule.

" red weekly " : But, what write in you " Chinese ox city " in this book, you are right A of a lot of China appear on the market the company undertook very careful analysis, what company do you value?

Roger this: I had explained repeatedly, this book is the method that invests in China to everybody introduction. Speak of investor should trying hard to discover the cheapest stock among them, no matter it is A, B, H still be S etc. In the book, I analyse some A appear on the market the company may fail, but this book is not the book that recommends a stock originally absolutely. But, if I can discover,put in a kind of the cheapest way to invest a “ really the word of the company of specific ” , one day I choose A possibly also.



After “ tells others world, my general controls some Chinese stocks to send children”

" red weekly " : Last year second half of the year, when Shanghai put together points to many a little bit 5000, you said to appear bubble, but you say not to sell China the share however, why?

Roger this: This is not contradictory, I did not buy A, but I can buy B, H, S. The China that I never had sold place hold appears on the market the stock of the company, because I had thought, wait for the children that I send them after I tell others world. I give long-term tenet in investment letter of China, I am not negotiant of a short line. Why? If I sell a share, I need to pay more tax, I still must have calculated the time that enters the market again to wait a moment. After imagining me to pay pay taxes, with higher price redemptive my stock? I have a lot of shares, some stocks I already hold 20 years of ~40 year differ, although be among these 40 years, a lot of stocks rise and fall errant.
Previous12 Next